Arsenic, well known of its toxicity, is present in potable water in many areas in the world, as well as in underground water used for water supply in Vojvodina, a region in Serbia. Its removal from raw water is necessary before distribution. In this work two methods of arsenic removal from water are compared. First method is water ozonation by introducing ozone in water and then filtration. Second method is treatment of water in plasma reactor and then filtration. High efficiency of the second method was confirmed by low concentration of arsenic in filtrate (below detection limit).
TY - JOUR
AU - Manojlović, Dragan
AU - Popara, A.
AU - Dojčinović, Biljana
AU - Nikolić, A.
AU - Obradović, Bratislav M.
AU - Kuraica, Milorad M.
AU - Purić, J.
PY - 2008
UR - https://cer.ihtm.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/453
AB - Arsenic, well known of its toxicity, is present in potable water in many areas in the world, as well as in underground water used for water supply in Vojvodina, a region in Serbia. Its removal from raw water is necessary before distribution. In this work two methods of arsenic removal from water are compared. First method is water ozonation by introducing ozone in water and then filtration. Second method is treatment of water in plasma reactor and then filtration. High efficiency of the second method was confirmed by low concentration of arsenic in filtrate (below detection limit).
T2 - Vacuum
T1 - Comparison of two methods for removal of arsenic from potable water
VL - 83
IS - 1
SP - 142
EP - 145
DO - 10.1016/j.vacuum.2008.03.045
ER -
@article{
author = "Manojlović, Dragan and Popara, A. and Dojčinović, Biljana and Nikolić, A. and Obradović, Bratislav M. and Kuraica, Milorad M. and Purić, J.",
year = "2008",
abstract = "Arsenic, well known of its toxicity, is present in potable water in many areas in the world, as well as in underground water used for water supply in Vojvodina, a region in Serbia. Its removal from raw water is necessary before distribution. In this work two methods of arsenic removal from water are compared. First method is water ozonation by introducing ozone in water and then filtration. Second method is treatment of water in plasma reactor and then filtration. High efficiency of the second method was confirmed by low concentration of arsenic in filtrate (below detection limit).",
journal = "Vacuum",
title = "Comparison of two methods for removal of arsenic from potable water",
volume = "83",
number = "1",
pages = "142-145",
doi = "10.1016/j.vacuum.2008.03.045"
}
Manojlović, D., Popara, A., Dojčinović, B., Nikolić, A., Obradović, B. M., Kuraica, M. M.,& Purić, J.. (2008). Comparison of two methods for removal of arsenic from potable water. in Vacuum, 83(1), 142-145.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2008.03.045
Manojlović D, Popara A, Dojčinović B, Nikolić A, Obradović BM, Kuraica MM, Purić J. Comparison of two methods for removal of arsenic from potable water. in Vacuum. 2008;83(1):142-145.
doi:10.1016/j.vacuum.2008.03.045 .
Manojlović, Dragan, Popara, A., Dojčinović, Biljana, Nikolić, A., Obradović, Bratislav M., Kuraica, Milorad M., Purić, J., "Comparison of two methods for removal of arsenic from potable water" in Vacuum, 83, no. 1 (2008):142-145,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2008.03.045 . .
