Comparison of two methods for removal of arsenic from potable water
Authorized Users Only
2008
Authors
Manojlović, Dragan
Popara, A.
Dojčinović, Biljana

Nikolić, A.
Obradović, Bratislav M.

Kuraica, Milorad M.

Purić, J.
Article (Published version)

Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Arsenic, well known of its toxicity, is present in potable water in many areas in the world, as well as in underground water used for water supply in Vojvodina, a region in Serbia. Its removal from raw water is necessary before distribution. In this work two methods of arsenic removal from water are compared. First method is water ozonation by introducing ozone in water and then filtration. Second method is treatment of water in plasma reactor and then filtration. High efficiency of the second method was confirmed by low concentration of arsenic in filtrate (below detection limit).
Keywords:
Arsenic / Dielectric barrier discharge / Plasma treatment / Potable waterSource:
Vacuum, 2008, 83, 1, 142-145Funding / projects:
- Spektroskopska dijagnostika plazme u izvorima značajnim za primene (RS-141043)
- Geohemijska ispitivanja u funkciji pronalaženja novih ležišta fosilnih goriva i zaštite životne sredine (RS-146008)
DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2008.03.045
ISSN: 0042-207X
WoS: 000259938000030
Scopus: 2-s2.0-50249187640
Collections
Institution/Community
IHTMTY - JOUR AU - Manojlović, Dragan AU - Popara, A. AU - Dojčinović, Biljana AU - Nikolić, A. AU - Obradović, Bratislav M. AU - Kuraica, Milorad M. AU - Purić, J. PY - 2008 UR - https://cer.ihtm.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/453 AB - Arsenic, well known of its toxicity, is present in potable water in many areas in the world, as well as in underground water used for water supply in Vojvodina, a region in Serbia. Its removal from raw water is necessary before distribution. In this work two methods of arsenic removal from water are compared. First method is water ozonation by introducing ozone in water and then filtration. Second method is treatment of water in plasma reactor and then filtration. High efficiency of the second method was confirmed by low concentration of arsenic in filtrate (below detection limit). T2 - Vacuum T1 - Comparison of two methods for removal of arsenic from potable water VL - 83 IS - 1 SP - 142 EP - 145 DO - 10.1016/j.vacuum.2008.03.045 ER -
@article{ author = "Manojlović, Dragan and Popara, A. and Dojčinović, Biljana and Nikolić, A. and Obradović, Bratislav M. and Kuraica, Milorad M. and Purić, J.", year = "2008", abstract = "Arsenic, well known of its toxicity, is present in potable water in many areas in the world, as well as in underground water used for water supply in Vojvodina, a region in Serbia. Its removal from raw water is necessary before distribution. In this work two methods of arsenic removal from water are compared. First method is water ozonation by introducing ozone in water and then filtration. Second method is treatment of water in plasma reactor and then filtration. High efficiency of the second method was confirmed by low concentration of arsenic in filtrate (below detection limit).", journal = "Vacuum", title = "Comparison of two methods for removal of arsenic from potable water", volume = "83", number = "1", pages = "142-145", doi = "10.1016/j.vacuum.2008.03.045" }
Manojlović, D., Popara, A., Dojčinović, B., Nikolić, A., Obradović, B. M., Kuraica, M. M.,& Purić, J.. (2008). Comparison of two methods for removal of arsenic from potable water. in Vacuum, 83(1), 142-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2008.03.045
Manojlović D, Popara A, Dojčinović B, Nikolić A, Obradović BM, Kuraica MM, Purić J. Comparison of two methods for removal of arsenic from potable water. in Vacuum. 2008;83(1):142-145. doi:10.1016/j.vacuum.2008.03.045 .
Manojlović, Dragan, Popara, A., Dojčinović, Biljana, Nikolić, A., Obradović, Bratislav M., Kuraica, Milorad M., Purić, J., "Comparison of two methods for removal of arsenic from potable water" in Vacuum, 83, no. 1 (2008):142-145, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2008.03.045 . .