Приказ основних података о документу

dc.creatorMrowinski, Maciej J.
dc.creatorFronczak, Agata
dc.creatorFronczak, Piotr
dc.creatorNedić, Olgica
dc.creatorDekanski, Aleksandar
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-22T08:42:53Z
dc.date.available2020-09-22T08:42:53Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn1588-2861
dc.identifier.issn0138-9130
dc.identifier.urihttps://cer.ihtm.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3683
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we provide insight into the editorial process as seen from the perspective of journal editors. We study a dataset obtained from the Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society, which contains information about submitted and rejected manuscripts, in order to find differences between local (Serbian) and external (non-Serbian) submissions. We show that external submissions (mainly from India, Iran and China) constitute the majority of all submissions, while local submissions are in the minority. Most of submissions are rejected for technical reasons (e.g. wrong manuscript formatting or problems with images) and many users resubmit the same paper without making necessary corrections. Manuscripts with just one author are less likely to pass the technical check, which can be attributed to missing metadata. Articles from local authors are better prepared and require fewer resubmissions on average before they are accepted for peer review. The peer review process for local submissions takes less time than for external papers and local submissions are more likely to be accepted for publication. Also, while there are more men than women among external users, this trend is reversed for local users. In the combined group of local and external users, articles submitted by women are more likely to be published than articles submitted by men.en
dc.language.isoensr
dc.publisherNetherlands : Springersr
dc.rightsopenAccesssr
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScientometricssr
dc.subjectPeer reviewsr
dc.subjectEditorial processsr
dc.subjectPublishingsr
dc.subjectSubmissions analysissr
dc.subjectEditor workloadsr
dc.titleThe hurdles of academic publishing from the perspective of journal editors: a case studyen
dc.typearticlesr
dc.rights.licenseBYsr
dcterms.abstractДекански, Aлександар; Мроwински, Мациеј Ј.; Фронцзак, Aгата; Фронцзак, Пиотр; Недић, Олгица;
dc.citation.volume125
dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.spage115
dc.citation.epage133
dc.citation.rankM21~
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11192-020-03619-x
dc.identifier.fulltexthttps://cer.ihtm.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/17348/Mrowinski2020_Article_TheHurdlesOfAcademicPublishing.pdf
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85088581660
dc.identifier.wos000552196500001
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionsr


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу