Differences in coating mechanism of structurally different aluminosilicates observed through the thermal analysis
Само за регистроване кориснике
2018
Чланак у часопису (Објављена верзија)

Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о документуАпстракт
Systematic modification of three structurally different minerals (zeolite, mica, and vermiculite) was carried out with the aim of determining the modification mechanism and exposing the hydrophobic surface that can be used as a sorbent for many organic compounds. Mechanism of modification with cationic surfactant depends strongly on the mineral type. In order to identify the influence of aluminosilicates structural differences on the modification process, adsorption experiments with organic matter and water vapor, supplemented with the DTA/TG analysis, were performed. The cation exchange capacity (CEC) value was 1454>560>28meqkg(-1) for zeolite (clinoptilolite), vermiculite, and mica (muscovite), respectively. Despite its CEC value, vermiculite adsorbed three times the amount of organic matter than did clinoptilolite due to the porous structure of zeolite, which acted to limit the adsorption only on the external exchangeable cations. If the loading amount is equal to the CEC or the ext...ernal cation exchange capacity for clinoptilolite (ECEC approximate to 10% CEC), the monolayer will form while mineral surface will have hydrophobic character. Only one active center exists at the surface of the clinoptilolite that was identified by DTA curves with a sharp and defined peak around 300 degrees C and by the mass loss at the TG diagrams. Two significant and equal active centers were observed in vermiculite, one for the exchange of the surface cations and the other for the interlayer cations and H2O molecules. Muscovite CEC is negligible, and due to the absence of any other functional groups, the modification of this mineral was impossible.
Кључне речи:
Clinoptilolite / Vermiculite / Muscovite / Modification / Organic matter / Thermal analysisИзвор:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2018, 134, 2, 1011-1019Издавач:
- Springer
Финансирање / пројекти:
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-018-7351-3
ISSN: 1388-6150
WoS: 000450801000018
Scopus: 2-s2.0-85047188339
Институција/група
IHTMTY - JOUR AU - Milićević, Sonja AU - Martinović, Sanja AU - Milošević, Vladan AU - Stojanović, Jovica AU - Povrenović, Dragan PY - 2018 UR - https://cer.ihtm.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2366 AB - Systematic modification of three structurally different minerals (zeolite, mica, and vermiculite) was carried out with the aim of determining the modification mechanism and exposing the hydrophobic surface that can be used as a sorbent for many organic compounds. Mechanism of modification with cationic surfactant depends strongly on the mineral type. In order to identify the influence of aluminosilicates structural differences on the modification process, adsorption experiments with organic matter and water vapor, supplemented with the DTA/TG analysis, were performed. The cation exchange capacity (CEC) value was 1454>560>28meqkg(-1) for zeolite (clinoptilolite), vermiculite, and mica (muscovite), respectively. Despite its CEC value, vermiculite adsorbed three times the amount of organic matter than did clinoptilolite due to the porous structure of zeolite, which acted to limit the adsorption only on the external exchangeable cations. If the loading amount is equal to the CEC or the external cation exchange capacity for clinoptilolite (ECEC approximate to 10% CEC), the monolayer will form while mineral surface will have hydrophobic character. Only one active center exists at the surface of the clinoptilolite that was identified by DTA curves with a sharp and defined peak around 300 degrees C and by the mass loss at the TG diagrams. Two significant and equal active centers were observed in vermiculite, one for the exchange of the surface cations and the other for the interlayer cations and H2O molecules. Muscovite CEC is negligible, and due to the absence of any other functional groups, the modification of this mineral was impossible. PB - Springer T2 - Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry T1 - Differences in coating mechanism of structurally different aluminosilicates observed through the thermal analysis VL - 134 IS - 2 SP - 1011 EP - 1019 DO - 10.1007/s10973-018-7351-3 ER -
@article{ author = "Milićević, Sonja and Martinović, Sanja and Milošević, Vladan and Stojanović, Jovica and Povrenović, Dragan", year = "2018", abstract = "Systematic modification of three structurally different minerals (zeolite, mica, and vermiculite) was carried out with the aim of determining the modification mechanism and exposing the hydrophobic surface that can be used as a sorbent for many organic compounds. Mechanism of modification with cationic surfactant depends strongly on the mineral type. In order to identify the influence of aluminosilicates structural differences on the modification process, adsorption experiments with organic matter and water vapor, supplemented with the DTA/TG analysis, were performed. The cation exchange capacity (CEC) value was 1454>560>28meqkg(-1) for zeolite (clinoptilolite), vermiculite, and mica (muscovite), respectively. Despite its CEC value, vermiculite adsorbed three times the amount of organic matter than did clinoptilolite due to the porous structure of zeolite, which acted to limit the adsorption only on the external exchangeable cations. If the loading amount is equal to the CEC or the external cation exchange capacity for clinoptilolite (ECEC approximate to 10% CEC), the monolayer will form while mineral surface will have hydrophobic character. Only one active center exists at the surface of the clinoptilolite that was identified by DTA curves with a sharp and defined peak around 300 degrees C and by the mass loss at the TG diagrams. Two significant and equal active centers were observed in vermiculite, one for the exchange of the surface cations and the other for the interlayer cations and H2O molecules. Muscovite CEC is negligible, and due to the absence of any other functional groups, the modification of this mineral was impossible.", publisher = "Springer", journal = "Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry", title = "Differences in coating mechanism of structurally different aluminosilicates observed through the thermal analysis", volume = "134", number = "2", pages = "1011-1019", doi = "10.1007/s10973-018-7351-3" }
Milićević, S., Martinović, S., Milošević, V., Stojanović, J.,& Povrenović, D.. (2018). Differences in coating mechanism of structurally different aluminosilicates observed through the thermal analysis. in Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Springer., 134(2), 1011-1019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7351-3
Milićević S, Martinović S, Milošević V, Stojanović J, Povrenović D. Differences in coating mechanism of structurally different aluminosilicates observed through the thermal analysis. in Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. 2018;134(2):1011-1019. doi:10.1007/s10973-018-7351-3 .
Milićević, Sonja, Martinović, Sanja, Milošević, Vladan, Stojanović, Jovica, Povrenović, Dragan, "Differences in coating mechanism of structurally different aluminosilicates observed through the thermal analysis" in Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 134, no. 2 (2018):1011-1019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7351-3 . .