CER - Centralni Repozitorijum IHTM-a
Institut za hemiju, tehnologiju i metalurgiju
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • Srpski (latinica) 
    • Engleski
    • Srpski (ćirilica)
    • Srpski (latinica)
  • Prijava
Pregled zapisa 
  •   CER
  • IHTM
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
  • Pregled zapisa
  •   CER
  • IHTM
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
  • Pregled zapisa
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Ranking and similarity of conventional, microwave and ultrasound element sequential extraction methods

Samo za registrovane korisnike
2018
Autori
Relić, Dubravka
Heberger, Karoly
Sakan, Sanja
Skrbic, Biljana
Popović, Aleksandar R.
Đorđević, Dragana
Članak u časopisu (Objavljena verzija)
Metapodaci
Prikaz svih podataka o dokumentu
Apstrakt
This study aims to compare three extraction techniques of four sequential element extraction steps from soil and sediment samples that were taken from the location of the Pancevo petrochemical industry (Serbia). Elements were extracted using three different techniques: conventional, microwave and ultrasound extraction. A novel procedure sum of the ranking differences (SRD) - was able to rank the techniques and elements, to see whether this method is a suitable tool to reveal the similarities and dissimilarities in element extraction techniques, provided that a proper ranking reference is available. The concentrations of the following elements Al, Ba, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, Pb, Si, Sn, Sr, V and Zn were determined through ICP OES. The different efficiencies and recovery values of element concentrations using each of the three extraction techniques were examined by the CRM BCR-701. By using SRD, we obtained a better separation between the different extraction techniqu...es and steps when we rank their differences among the samples while lower separation was obtained according to analysed elements. Appling this method for ordering the elements could be useful for three purposes: (i) to find possible associations among the elements; (ii) to find possible elements that have outlier concentrations or (iii) detect differences in geochemical origin or behaviour of elements. Cross-validation of the SRD values in combination with cluster and principal component analysis revealed the same groups of extraction steps and techniques.

Ključne reči:
Sequential extraction / Steps and techniques comparison / Ordering / Pattern recognition
Izvor:
Chemosphere, 2018, 198, 103-110
Izdavač:
  • Oxford : Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd
Finansiranje / projekti:
  • Proučavanje fizičkohemijskih i biohemijskih procesa u životnoj sredini koji utiču na zagađenje i istraživanje mogućnosti za minimiziranje posledica (RS-172001)
  • Istraživanje klimatskih promena i njihovog uticaja na životnu sredinu - praćenje uticaja, adaptacija i ublažavanje (RS-43007)
  • OTKA [K119269]
Napomena:
  • The peer-reviewed version: http://cer.ihtm.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2934

DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.200

ISSN: 0045-6535

PubMed: 29421718

WoS: 000427338800012

Scopus: 2-s2.0-85041476147
[ Google Scholar ]
6
3
URI
https://cer.ihtm.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2324
Kolekcije
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
Institucija/grupa
IHTM
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Relić, Dubravka
AU  - Heberger, Karoly
AU  - Sakan, Sanja
AU  - Skrbic, Biljana
AU  - Popović, Aleksandar R.
AU  - Đorđević, Dragana
PY  - 2018
UR  - https://cer.ihtm.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2324
AB  - This study aims to compare three extraction techniques of four sequential element extraction steps from soil and sediment samples that were taken from the location of the Pancevo petrochemical industry (Serbia). Elements were extracted using three different techniques: conventional, microwave and ultrasound extraction. A novel procedure sum of the ranking differences (SRD) - was able to rank the techniques and elements, to see whether this method is a suitable tool to reveal the similarities and dissimilarities in element extraction techniques, provided that a proper ranking reference is available. The concentrations of the following elements Al, Ba, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, Pb, Si, Sn, Sr, V and Zn were determined through ICP OES. The different efficiencies and recovery values of element concentrations using each of the three extraction techniques were examined by the CRM BCR-701. By using SRD, we obtained a better separation between the different extraction techniques and steps when we rank their differences among the samples while lower separation was obtained according to analysed elements. Appling this method for ordering the elements could be useful for three purposes: (i) to find possible associations among the elements; (ii) to find possible elements that have outlier concentrations or (iii) detect differences in geochemical origin or behaviour of elements. Cross-validation of the SRD values in combination with cluster and principal component analysis revealed the same groups of extraction steps and techniques.
PB  - Oxford : Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd
T2  - Chemosphere
T1  - Ranking and similarity of conventional, microwave and ultrasound element sequential extraction methods
VL  - 198
SP  - 103
EP  - 110
DO  - 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.200
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Relić, Dubravka and Heberger, Karoly and Sakan, Sanja and Skrbic, Biljana and Popović, Aleksandar R. and Đorđević, Dragana",
year = "2018",
abstract = "This study aims to compare three extraction techniques of four sequential element extraction steps from soil and sediment samples that were taken from the location of the Pancevo petrochemical industry (Serbia). Elements were extracted using three different techniques: conventional, microwave and ultrasound extraction. A novel procedure sum of the ranking differences (SRD) - was able to rank the techniques and elements, to see whether this method is a suitable tool to reveal the similarities and dissimilarities in element extraction techniques, provided that a proper ranking reference is available. The concentrations of the following elements Al, Ba, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, Pb, Si, Sn, Sr, V and Zn were determined through ICP OES. The different efficiencies and recovery values of element concentrations using each of the three extraction techniques were examined by the CRM BCR-701. By using SRD, we obtained a better separation between the different extraction techniques and steps when we rank their differences among the samples while lower separation was obtained according to analysed elements. Appling this method for ordering the elements could be useful for three purposes: (i) to find possible associations among the elements; (ii) to find possible elements that have outlier concentrations or (iii) detect differences in geochemical origin or behaviour of elements. Cross-validation of the SRD values in combination with cluster and principal component analysis revealed the same groups of extraction steps and techniques.",
publisher = "Oxford : Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd",
journal = "Chemosphere",
title = "Ranking and similarity of conventional, microwave and ultrasound element sequential extraction methods",
volume = "198",
pages = "103-110",
doi = "10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.200"
}
Relić, D., Heberger, K., Sakan, S., Skrbic, B., Popović, A. R.,& Đorđević, D.. (2018). Ranking and similarity of conventional, microwave and ultrasound element sequential extraction methods. in Chemosphere
Oxford : Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd., 198, 103-110.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.200
Relić D, Heberger K, Sakan S, Skrbic B, Popović AR, Đorđević D. Ranking and similarity of conventional, microwave and ultrasound element sequential extraction methods. in Chemosphere. 2018;198:103-110.
doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.200 .
Relić, Dubravka, Heberger, Karoly, Sakan, Sanja, Skrbic, Biljana, Popović, Aleksandar R., Đorđević, Dragana, "Ranking and similarity of conventional, microwave and ultrasound element sequential extraction methods" in Chemosphere, 198 (2018):103-110,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.200 . .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
O Centralnom repozitorijumu (CeR) | Pošaljite zapažanja

re3dataOpenAIRERCUB
 

 

Kompletan repozitorijumInstitucije/grupeAutoriNasloviTemeOva institucijaAutoriNasloviTeme

Statistika

Pregled statistika

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
O Centralnom repozitorijumu (CeR) | Pošaljite zapažanja

re3dataOpenAIRERCUB