Ranking and similarity of conventional, microwave and ultrasound element sequential extraction methods
Authorized Users Only
2018
Authors
Relić, Dubravka
Heberger, Karoly
Sakan, Sanja

Skrbic, Biljana
Popović, Aleksandar R.

Đorđević, Dragana

Article (Published version)

Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
This study aims to compare three extraction techniques of four sequential element extraction steps from soil and sediment samples that were taken from the location of the Pancevo petrochemical industry (Serbia). Elements were extracted using three different techniques: conventional, microwave and ultrasound extraction. A novel procedure sum of the ranking differences (SRD) - was able to rank the techniques and elements, to see whether this method is a suitable tool to reveal the similarities and dissimilarities in element extraction techniques, provided that a proper ranking reference is available. The concentrations of the following elements Al, Ba, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, Pb, Si, Sn, Sr, V and Zn were determined through ICP OES. The different efficiencies and recovery values of element concentrations using each of the three extraction techniques were examined by the CRM BCR-701. By using SRD, we obtained a better separation between the different extraction techniqu...es and steps when we rank their differences among the samples while lower separation was obtained according to analysed elements. Appling this method for ordering the elements could be useful for three purposes: (i) to find possible associations among the elements; (ii) to find possible elements that have outlier concentrations or (iii) detect differences in geochemical origin or behaviour of elements. Cross-validation of the SRD values in combination with cluster and principal component analysis revealed the same groups of extraction steps and techniques.
Keywords:
Sequential extraction / Steps and techniques comparison / Ordering / Pattern recognitionSource:
Chemosphere, 2018, 198, 103-110Publisher:
- Oxford : Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd
Funding / projects:
- The study of physicochemical and biochemical processes in living environment that have impacts on pollution and the investigation of possibilities for minimizing the consequences (RS-172001)
- Studying climate change and its influence on environment: impacts, adaptation and mitigation (RS-43007)
- OTKA [K119269]
Note:
- The peer-reviewed version: http://cer.ihtm.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2934
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.200
ISSN: 0045-6535
PubMed: 29421718
WoS: 000427338800012
Scopus: 2-s2.0-85041476147
Collections
Institution/Community
IHTMTY - JOUR AU - Relić, Dubravka AU - Heberger, Karoly AU - Sakan, Sanja AU - Skrbic, Biljana AU - Popović, Aleksandar R. AU - Đorđević, Dragana PY - 2018 UR - https://cer.ihtm.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2324 AB - This study aims to compare three extraction techniques of four sequential element extraction steps from soil and sediment samples that were taken from the location of the Pancevo petrochemical industry (Serbia). Elements were extracted using three different techniques: conventional, microwave and ultrasound extraction. A novel procedure sum of the ranking differences (SRD) - was able to rank the techniques and elements, to see whether this method is a suitable tool to reveal the similarities and dissimilarities in element extraction techniques, provided that a proper ranking reference is available. The concentrations of the following elements Al, Ba, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, Pb, Si, Sn, Sr, V and Zn were determined through ICP OES. The different efficiencies and recovery values of element concentrations using each of the three extraction techniques were examined by the CRM BCR-701. By using SRD, we obtained a better separation between the different extraction techniques and steps when we rank their differences among the samples while lower separation was obtained according to analysed elements. Appling this method for ordering the elements could be useful for three purposes: (i) to find possible associations among the elements; (ii) to find possible elements that have outlier concentrations or (iii) detect differences in geochemical origin or behaviour of elements. Cross-validation of the SRD values in combination with cluster and principal component analysis revealed the same groups of extraction steps and techniques. PB - Oxford : Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd T2 - Chemosphere T1 - Ranking and similarity of conventional, microwave and ultrasound element sequential extraction methods VL - 198 SP - 103 EP - 110 DO - 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.200 ER -
@article{ author = "Relić, Dubravka and Heberger, Karoly and Sakan, Sanja and Skrbic, Biljana and Popović, Aleksandar R. and Đorđević, Dragana", year = "2018", abstract = "This study aims to compare three extraction techniques of four sequential element extraction steps from soil and sediment samples that were taken from the location of the Pancevo petrochemical industry (Serbia). Elements were extracted using three different techniques: conventional, microwave and ultrasound extraction. A novel procedure sum of the ranking differences (SRD) - was able to rank the techniques and elements, to see whether this method is a suitable tool to reveal the similarities and dissimilarities in element extraction techniques, provided that a proper ranking reference is available. The concentrations of the following elements Al, Ba, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, Pb, Si, Sn, Sr, V and Zn were determined through ICP OES. The different efficiencies and recovery values of element concentrations using each of the three extraction techniques were examined by the CRM BCR-701. By using SRD, we obtained a better separation between the different extraction techniques and steps when we rank their differences among the samples while lower separation was obtained according to analysed elements. Appling this method for ordering the elements could be useful for three purposes: (i) to find possible associations among the elements; (ii) to find possible elements that have outlier concentrations or (iii) detect differences in geochemical origin or behaviour of elements. Cross-validation of the SRD values in combination with cluster and principal component analysis revealed the same groups of extraction steps and techniques.", publisher = "Oxford : Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd", journal = "Chemosphere", title = "Ranking and similarity of conventional, microwave and ultrasound element sequential extraction methods", volume = "198", pages = "103-110", doi = "10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.200" }
Relić, D., Heberger, K., Sakan, S., Skrbic, B., Popović, A. R.,& Đorđević, D.. (2018). Ranking and similarity of conventional, microwave and ultrasound element sequential extraction methods. in Chemosphere Oxford : Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd., 198, 103-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.200
Relić D, Heberger K, Sakan S, Skrbic B, Popović AR, Đorđević D. Ranking and similarity of conventional, microwave and ultrasound element sequential extraction methods. in Chemosphere. 2018;198:103-110. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.200 .
Relić, Dubravka, Heberger, Karoly, Sakan, Sanja, Skrbic, Biljana, Popović, Aleksandar R., Đorđević, Dragana, "Ranking and similarity of conventional, microwave and ultrasound element sequential extraction methods" in Chemosphere, 198 (2018):103-110, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.200 . .