Benchmarking study on eighteen methods, including MP2, B2PLYP-D3, B2PLYP-D3BJ, coB97xD, M05-D3, M06-D3, M052X-D3, M061-1F-D3, PBEO-D3, PBEO-D3BJ, B3LYP-D3, B3LYP-D3DJ, TPSS-D3, TPSS-D3BJ, BP86-D3, BP86-D3BJ, BLYP-D3, BLYP-D3BJ and ten basis sets: cc-pVDZ, cc-pVTZ, aug-cc-pVDZ, cc-pVQZ, def2-SVP, def2-TZVP, def2-TZVPP, def2-QZVP, 6-311++G" and 6-31G", for each method, have been performed, calculating interaction energies in (1) unsaturated/unsaturated systems (2-butene dimers), (2) unsaturated/saturated system (between butane and 2-butene) and (3) saturated/saturated (butane dimers). The calculated interaction energies are compared with accurate CCSD(T)/CBS energies. The data show that most levels of theory have the highest errors for systems with butane dimers, and calculated interaction energies in these systems are overestimated. The best levels, overall for all systems, are BLYP-D3BJ/clef2-QZVP and BLYP-D3BJ/cc-pVQZ with similar root mean square deviation (RMSD) values of 0.056 kcal... mo1-1 and 0.060 kcalmorl compared to CCSD(T) values. The best level for (1) 2-butene dimers is B3LYP-D3BJ/aug-cc-pVDZ; for (2) interactions between 2-butene and butane is BLYP-D3BJ/def2-SVP; while for (3) butane dimers is BLYP-D3BJ/def2-QZVP. The differences in calculated energies among several methods are not high, however, it is important that most of the DFT methods overestimate interactions in butane dimers.
TY - JOUR
AU - Zarić, Milana
AU - Bugarski, Branko
AU - Kijevčanin, Mirjana
PY - 2017
UR - https://cer.ihtm.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2155
AB - Benchmarking study on eighteen methods, including MP2, B2PLYP-D3, B2PLYP-D3BJ, coB97xD, M05-D3, M06-D3, M052X-D3, M061-1F-D3, PBEO-D3, PBEO-D3BJ, B3LYP-D3, B3LYP-D3DJ, TPSS-D3, TPSS-D3BJ, BP86-D3, BP86-D3BJ, BLYP-D3, BLYP-D3BJ and ten basis sets: cc-pVDZ, cc-pVTZ, aug-cc-pVDZ, cc-pVQZ, def2-SVP, def2-TZVP, def2-TZVPP, def2-QZVP, 6-311++G" and 6-31G", for each method, have been performed, calculating interaction energies in (1) unsaturated/unsaturated systems (2-butene dimers), (2) unsaturated/saturated system (between butane and 2-butene) and (3) saturated/saturated (butane dimers). The calculated interaction energies are compared with accurate CCSD(T)/CBS energies. The data show that most levels of theory have the highest errors for systems with butane dimers, and calculated interaction energies in these systems are overestimated. The best levels, overall for all systems, are BLYP-D3BJ/clef2-QZVP and BLYP-D3BJ/cc-pVQZ with similar root mean square deviation (RMSD) values of 0.056 kcal mo1-1 and 0.060 kcalmorl compared to CCSD(T) values. The best level for (1) 2-butene dimers is B3LYP-D3BJ/aug-cc-pVDZ; for (2) interactions between 2-butene and butane is BLYP-D3BJ/def2-SVP; while for (3) butane dimers is BLYP-D3BJ/def2-QZVP. The differences in calculated energies among several methods are not high, however, it is important that most of the DFT methods overestimate interactions in butane dimers.
PB - Elsevier
T2 - Computational and Theoretical Chemistry
T1 - Best methods for calculating interaction energies in 2-butene and butane systems
VL - 1117
SP - 150
EP - 161
DO - 10.1016/j.comptc.2017.08.001
UR - Conv_3810
ER -
@article{
author = "Zarić, Milana and Bugarski, Branko and Kijevčanin, Mirjana",
year = "2017",
abstract = "Benchmarking study on eighteen methods, including MP2, B2PLYP-D3, B2PLYP-D3BJ, coB97xD, M05-D3, M06-D3, M052X-D3, M061-1F-D3, PBEO-D3, PBEO-D3BJ, B3LYP-D3, B3LYP-D3DJ, TPSS-D3, TPSS-D3BJ, BP86-D3, BP86-D3BJ, BLYP-D3, BLYP-D3BJ and ten basis sets: cc-pVDZ, cc-pVTZ, aug-cc-pVDZ, cc-pVQZ, def2-SVP, def2-TZVP, def2-TZVPP, def2-QZVP, 6-311++G" and 6-31G", for each method, have been performed, calculating interaction energies in (1) unsaturated/unsaturated systems (2-butene dimers), (2) unsaturated/saturated system (between butane and 2-butene) and (3) saturated/saturated (butane dimers). The calculated interaction energies are compared with accurate CCSD(T)/CBS energies. The data show that most levels of theory have the highest errors for systems with butane dimers, and calculated interaction energies in these systems are overestimated. The best levels, overall for all systems, are BLYP-D3BJ/clef2-QZVP and BLYP-D3BJ/cc-pVQZ with similar root mean square deviation (RMSD) values of 0.056 kcal mo1-1 and 0.060 kcalmorl compared to CCSD(T) values. The best level for (1) 2-butene dimers is B3LYP-D3BJ/aug-cc-pVDZ; for (2) interactions between 2-butene and butane is BLYP-D3BJ/def2-SVP; while for (3) butane dimers is BLYP-D3BJ/def2-QZVP. The differences in calculated energies among several methods are not high, however, it is important that most of the DFT methods overestimate interactions in butane dimers.",
publisher = "Elsevier",
journal = "Computational and Theoretical Chemistry",
title = "Best methods for calculating interaction energies in 2-butene and butane systems",
volume = "1117",
pages = "150-161",
doi = "10.1016/j.comptc.2017.08.001",
url = "Conv_3810"
}
Zarić, M., Bugarski, B.,& Kijevčanin, M.. (2017). Best methods for calculating interaction energies in 2-butene and butane systems. in Computational and Theoretical Chemistry
Elsevier., 1117, 150-161.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comptc.2017.08.001
Conv_3810
Zarić M, Bugarski B, Kijevčanin M. Best methods for calculating interaction energies in 2-butene and butane systems. in Computational and Theoretical Chemistry. 2017;1117:150-161.
doi:10.1016/j.comptc.2017.08.001
Conv_3810 .
Zarić, Milana, Bugarski, Branko, Kijevčanin, Mirjana, "Best methods for calculating interaction energies in 2-butene and butane systems" in Computational and Theoretical Chemistry, 1117 (2017):150-161,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comptc.2017.08.001 .,
Conv_3810 .
