Ausloos, Marcel

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
e3eb3cd6-1f9e-46cf-9a26-288bebb51b83
  • Ausloos, Marcel (5)
Projects

Author's Bibliography

Seasonal Entropy, Diversity and Inequality Measures of Submitted and Accepted Papers Distributions in Peer-Reviewed Journals

Ausloos, Marcel; Nedić, Olgica; Dekanski, Aleksandar

(MDPI, 2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ausloos, Marcel
AU  - Nedić, Olgica
AU  - Dekanski, Aleksandar
PY  - 2019
UR  - https://cer.ihtm.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3038
AB  - This paper presents a novel method for finding features in the analysis of variable distributions stemming from time series. We apply the methodology to the case of submitted and accepted papers in peer-reviewed journals. We provide a comparative study of editorial decisions for papers submitted to two peer-reviewed journals: the Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society (JSCS) and this MDPI Entropy journal. We cover three recent years for which the fate of submitted papers-about 600 papers to JSCS and 2500 to Entropy-is completely determined. Instead of comparing the number distributions of these papers as a function of time with respect to a uniform distribution, we analyze the relevant probabilities, from which we derive the information entropy. It is argued that such probabilities are indeed more relevant for authors than the actual number of submissions. We tie this entropy analysis to the so called diversity of the variable distributions. Furthermore, we emphasize the correspondence between the entropy and the diversity with inequality measures, like the Herfindahl-Hirschman index and the Theil index, itself being in the class of entropy measures; the Gini coefficient which also measures the diversity in ranking is calculated for further discussion. In this sample, the seasonal aspects of the peer review process are outlined. It is found that the use of such indices, non linear transformations of the data distributions, allow us to distinguish features and evolutions of the peer review process as a function of time as well as comparing the non-uniformity of distributions. Furthermore, t- and z-statistical tests are applied in order to measure the significance (p-level) of the findings, that is, whether papers are more likely to be accepted if they are submitted during a few specific months or during a particular "season"; the predictability strength depends on the journal.
PB  - MDPI
T2  - Entropy
T1  - Seasonal Entropy, Diversity and Inequality Measures of Submitted and Accepted Papers Distributions in Peer-Reviewed Journals
VL  - 21
IS  - 6
SP  - 564
DO  - 10.3390/e21060564
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ausloos, Marcel and Nedić, Olgica and Dekanski, Aleksandar",
year = "2019",
abstract = "This paper presents a novel method for finding features in the analysis of variable distributions stemming from time series. We apply the methodology to the case of submitted and accepted papers in peer-reviewed journals. We provide a comparative study of editorial decisions for papers submitted to two peer-reviewed journals: the Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society (JSCS) and this MDPI Entropy journal. We cover three recent years for which the fate of submitted papers-about 600 papers to JSCS and 2500 to Entropy-is completely determined. Instead of comparing the number distributions of these papers as a function of time with respect to a uniform distribution, we analyze the relevant probabilities, from which we derive the information entropy. It is argued that such probabilities are indeed more relevant for authors than the actual number of submissions. We tie this entropy analysis to the so called diversity of the variable distributions. Furthermore, we emphasize the correspondence between the entropy and the diversity with inequality measures, like the Herfindahl-Hirschman index and the Theil index, itself being in the class of entropy measures; the Gini coefficient which also measures the diversity in ranking is calculated for further discussion. In this sample, the seasonal aspects of the peer review process are outlined. It is found that the use of such indices, non linear transformations of the data distributions, allow us to distinguish features and evolutions of the peer review process as a function of time as well as comparing the non-uniformity of distributions. Furthermore, t- and z-statistical tests are applied in order to measure the significance (p-level) of the findings, that is, whether papers are more likely to be accepted if they are submitted during a few specific months or during a particular "season"; the predictability strength depends on the journal.",
publisher = "MDPI",
journal = "Entropy",
title = "Seasonal Entropy, Diversity and Inequality Measures of Submitted and Accepted Papers Distributions in Peer-Reviewed Journals",
volume = "21",
number = "6",
pages = "564",
doi = "10.3390/e21060564"
}
Ausloos, M., Nedić, O.,& Dekanski, A.. (2019). Seasonal Entropy, Diversity and Inequality Measures of Submitted and Accepted Papers Distributions in Peer-Reviewed Journals. in Entropy
MDPI., 21(6), 564.
https://doi.org/10.3390/e21060564
Ausloos M, Nedić O, Dekanski A. Seasonal Entropy, Diversity and Inequality Measures of Submitted and Accepted Papers Distributions in Peer-Reviewed Journals. in Entropy. 2019;21(6):564.
doi:10.3390/e21060564 .
Ausloos, Marcel, Nedić, Olgica, Dekanski, Aleksandar, "Seasonal Entropy, Diversity and Inequality Measures of Submitted and Accepted Papers Distributions in Peer-Reviewed Journals" in Entropy, 21, no. 6 (2019):564,
https://doi.org/10.3390/e21060564 . .
1
4
4

Correlations between submission and acceptance of papers in peer review journals

Ausloos, Marcel; Nedić, Olgica; Dekanski, Aleksandar

(Springer Nature, 2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ausloos, Marcel
AU  - Nedić, Olgica
AU  - Dekanski, Aleksandar
PY  - 2019
UR  - https://cer.ihtm.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2641
AB  - This paper provides a comparative study about seasonal influence on editorial decisions for papers submitted to two peer review journals. We distinguish a specialized one, the Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society (JSCS) and an interdisciplinary one, Entropy. Dates of electronic submission for about 600 papers to JSCS and 2500 to Entropy have been recorded over 3 recent years. Time series of either accepted or rejected papers are subsequently analyzed. We take either editors or authors view points into account, thereby considering magnitudes and probabilities. In this sample, it is found that there are distinguishable peaks and dips in the time series, demonstrating preferred months for the submission of papers. It is also found that papers are more likely accepted if they are submitted during a few specific months—these depending on the journal. The probability of having a rejected paper also appears to be seasonally biased. In view of clarifying reports with contradictory findings, we discuss previously proposed conjectures for such effects, like holiday effects and the desk rejection by editors. We conclude that, in this sample, the type of journal, specialized or multidisciplinary, seems to be the drastic criterion for distinguishing the outcomes rates.
PB  - Springer Nature
T2  - Scientometrics
T2  - Scientometrics
T1  - Correlations between submission and acceptance of papers in peer review journals
VL  - 119
SP  - 279
EP  - 302
DO  - 10.1007/s11192-019-03026-x
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ausloos, Marcel and Nedić, Olgica and Dekanski, Aleksandar",
year = "2019",
abstract = "This paper provides a comparative study about seasonal influence on editorial decisions for papers submitted to two peer review journals. We distinguish a specialized one, the Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society (JSCS) and an interdisciplinary one, Entropy. Dates of electronic submission for about 600 papers to JSCS and 2500 to Entropy have been recorded over 3 recent years. Time series of either accepted or rejected papers are subsequently analyzed. We take either editors or authors view points into account, thereby considering magnitudes and probabilities. In this sample, it is found that there are distinguishable peaks and dips in the time series, demonstrating preferred months for the submission of papers. It is also found that papers are more likely accepted if they are submitted during a few specific months—these depending on the journal. The probability of having a rejected paper also appears to be seasonally biased. In view of clarifying reports with contradictory findings, we discuss previously proposed conjectures for such effects, like holiday effects and the desk rejection by editors. We conclude that, in this sample, the type of journal, specialized or multidisciplinary, seems to be the drastic criterion for distinguishing the outcomes rates.",
publisher = "Springer Nature",
journal = "Scientometrics, Scientometrics",
title = "Correlations between submission and acceptance of papers in peer review journals",
volume = "119",
pages = "279-302",
doi = "10.1007/s11192-019-03026-x"
}
Ausloos, M., Nedić, O.,& Dekanski, A.. (2019). Correlations between submission and acceptance of papers in peer review journals. in Scientometrics
Springer Nature., 119, 279-302.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03026-x
Ausloos M, Nedić O, Dekanski A. Correlations between submission and acceptance of papers in peer review journals. in Scientometrics. 2019;119:279-302.
doi:10.1007/s11192-019-03026-x .
Ausloos, Marcel, Nedić, Olgica, Dekanski, Aleksandar, "Correlations between submission and acceptance of papers in peer review journals" in Scientometrics, 119 (2019):279-302,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03026-x . .
26
2
3
4

Day of the week effect in paper submission/acceptance/rejection to/in/by peer review journals. II. An ARCH econometric-like modeling

Ausloos, Marcel; Nedić, Olgica; Dekanski, Aleksandar; Mrowinski, Maciej J.; Fronczak, Piotr; Fronczak, Agata

(Elsevier, 2017)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ausloos, Marcel
AU  - Nedić, Olgica
AU  - Dekanski, Aleksandar
AU  - Mrowinski, Maciej J.
AU  - Fronczak, Piotr
AU  - Fronczak, Agata
PY  - 2017
UR  - https://cer.ihtm.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3012
AB  - This paper aims at providing a statistical model for the preferred behavior of authors submitting a paper to a scientific journal. The electronic submission of (about 600) papers to the Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society has been recorded for every day from Jan. 01, 2013 till Dec. 31, 2014, together with the acceptance or rejection paper fate. Seasonal effects and editor roles (through desk rejection and subfield editors) are examined. An ARCH-like econometric model is derived stressing the main determinants of the favorite day-of-week process.
PB  - Elsevier
T2  - Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
T1  - Day of the week effect in paper submission/acceptance/rejection to/in/by peer review journals. II. An ARCH econometric-like modeling
VL  - 468
SP  - 462
EP  - 474
DO  - 10.1016/j.physa.2016.10.078
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ausloos, Marcel and Nedić, Olgica and Dekanski, Aleksandar and Mrowinski, Maciej J. and Fronczak, Piotr and Fronczak, Agata",
year = "2017",
abstract = "This paper aims at providing a statistical model for the preferred behavior of authors submitting a paper to a scientific journal. The electronic submission of (about 600) papers to the Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society has been recorded for every day from Jan. 01, 2013 till Dec. 31, 2014, together with the acceptance or rejection paper fate. Seasonal effects and editor roles (through desk rejection and subfield editors) are examined. An ARCH-like econometric model is derived stressing the main determinants of the favorite day-of-week process.",
publisher = "Elsevier",
journal = "Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications",
title = "Day of the week effect in paper submission/acceptance/rejection to/in/by peer review journals. II. An ARCH econometric-like modeling",
volume = "468",
pages = "462-474",
doi = "10.1016/j.physa.2016.10.078"
}
Ausloos, M., Nedić, O., Dekanski, A., Mrowinski, M. J., Fronczak, P.,& Fronczak, A.. (2017). Day of the week effect in paper submission/acceptance/rejection to/in/by peer review journals. II. An ARCH econometric-like modeling. in Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
Elsevier., 468, 462-474.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2016.10.078
Ausloos M, Nedić O, Dekanski A, Mrowinski MJ, Fronczak P, Fronczak A. Day of the week effect in paper submission/acceptance/rejection to/in/by peer review journals. II. An ARCH econometric-like modeling. in Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. 2017;468:462-474.
doi:10.1016/j.physa.2016.10.078 .
Ausloos, Marcel, Nedić, Olgica, Dekanski, Aleksandar, Mrowinski, Maciej J., Fronczak, Piotr, Fronczak, Agata, "Day of the week effect in paper submission/acceptance/rejection to/in/by peer review journals. II. An ARCH econometric-like modeling" in Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 468 (2017):462-474,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2016.10.078 . .
72
9
7
8

Day of the week effect in paper submission/acceptance/rejection to/in/by peer review journals. II. An ARCH econometric-like modeling

Ausloos, Marcel; Nedić, Olgica; Dekanski, Aleksandar; Mrowinski, Maciej J.; Fronczak, Piotr; Fronczak, Agata

(Elsevier, 2017)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ausloos, Marcel
AU  - Nedić, Olgica
AU  - Dekanski, Aleksandar
AU  - Mrowinski, Maciej J.
AU  - Fronczak, Piotr
AU  - Fronczak, Agata
PY  - 2017
UR  - https://cer.ihtm.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2053
AB  - This paper aims at providing a statistical model for the preferred behavior of authors submitting a paper to a scientific journal. The electronic submission of (about 600) papers to the Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society has been recorded for every day from Jan. 01, 2013 till Dec. 31, 2014, together with the acceptance or rejection paper fate. Seasonal effects and editor roles (through desk rejection and subfield editors) are examined. An ARCH-like econometric model is derived stressing the main determinants of the favorite day-of-week process.
PB  - Elsevier
T2  - Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
T1  - Day of the week effect in paper submission/acceptance/rejection to/in/by peer review journals. II. An ARCH econometric-like modeling
VL  - 468
SP  - 462
EP  - 474
DO  - 10.1016/j.physa.2016.10.078
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ausloos, Marcel and Nedić, Olgica and Dekanski, Aleksandar and Mrowinski, Maciej J. and Fronczak, Piotr and Fronczak, Agata",
year = "2017",
abstract = "This paper aims at providing a statistical model for the preferred behavior of authors submitting a paper to a scientific journal. The electronic submission of (about 600) papers to the Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society has been recorded for every day from Jan. 01, 2013 till Dec. 31, 2014, together with the acceptance or rejection paper fate. Seasonal effects and editor roles (through desk rejection and subfield editors) are examined. An ARCH-like econometric model is derived stressing the main determinants of the favorite day-of-week process.",
publisher = "Elsevier",
journal = "Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications",
title = "Day of the week effect in paper submission/acceptance/rejection to/in/by peer review journals. II. An ARCH econometric-like modeling",
volume = "468",
pages = "462-474",
doi = "10.1016/j.physa.2016.10.078"
}
Ausloos, M., Nedić, O., Dekanski, A., Mrowinski, M. J., Fronczak, P.,& Fronczak, A.. (2017). Day of the week effect in paper submission/acceptance/rejection to/in/by peer review journals. II. An ARCH econometric-like modeling. in Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
Elsevier., 468, 462-474.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2016.10.078
Ausloos M, Nedić O, Dekanski A, Mrowinski MJ, Fronczak P, Fronczak A. Day of the week effect in paper submission/acceptance/rejection to/in/by peer review journals. II. An ARCH econometric-like modeling. in Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. 2017;468:462-474.
doi:10.1016/j.physa.2016.10.078 .
Ausloos, Marcel, Nedić, Olgica, Dekanski, Aleksandar, Mrowinski, Maciej J., Fronczak, Piotr, Fronczak, Agata, "Day of the week effect in paper submission/acceptance/rejection to/in/by peer review journals. II. An ARCH econometric-like modeling" in Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 468 (2017):462-474,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2016.10.078 . .
72
9
7
8

Day of the week effect in paper submission/acceptance/rejection to/in/by peer review journals

Ausloos, Marcel; Nedić, Olgica; Dekanski, Aleksandar

(Elsevier, 2016)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ausloos, Marcel
AU  - Nedić, Olgica
AU  - Dekanski, Aleksandar
PY  - 2016
UR  - https://cer.ihtm.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2026
AB  - This paper aims at providing an introduction to the behavior of authors submitting a paper to a scientific journal. Dates of electronic submission of papers to the Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society have been recorded from the 1st January 2013 till the 31st December 2014, thus over 2 years. There is no Monday or Friday effect like in financial markets, but rather a Tuesday-Wednesday effect occurs: papers are more often submitted on Wednesday; however, the relative number of going to be accepted papers is larger if these are submitted on Tuesday. On the other hand, weekend days (Saturday and Sunday) are not the best days to finalize and submit manuscripts. An interpretation based on the type of submitted work ("experimental chemistry") and on the influence of (senior) coauthors is presented. A thermodynamic connection is proposed within an entropy context. A (new) entropic distance is defined in order to measure the "opaqueness" = disorder) of the submission process.
PB  - Elsevier
T2  - Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
T1  - Day of the week effect in paper submission/acceptance/rejection to/in/by peer review journals
VL  - 456
SP  - 197
EP  - 203
DO  - 10.1016/j.physa.2016.03.032
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ausloos, Marcel and Nedić, Olgica and Dekanski, Aleksandar",
year = "2016",
abstract = "This paper aims at providing an introduction to the behavior of authors submitting a paper to a scientific journal. Dates of electronic submission of papers to the Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society have been recorded from the 1st January 2013 till the 31st December 2014, thus over 2 years. There is no Monday or Friday effect like in financial markets, but rather a Tuesday-Wednesday effect occurs: papers are more often submitted on Wednesday; however, the relative number of going to be accepted papers is larger if these are submitted on Tuesday. On the other hand, weekend days (Saturday and Sunday) are not the best days to finalize and submit manuscripts. An interpretation based on the type of submitted work ("experimental chemistry") and on the influence of (senior) coauthors is presented. A thermodynamic connection is proposed within an entropy context. A (new) entropic distance is defined in order to measure the "opaqueness" = disorder) of the submission process.",
publisher = "Elsevier",
journal = "Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications",
title = "Day of the week effect in paper submission/acceptance/rejection to/in/by peer review journals",
volume = "456",
pages = "197-203",
doi = "10.1016/j.physa.2016.03.032"
}
Ausloos, M., Nedić, O.,& Dekanski, A.. (2016). Day of the week effect in paper submission/acceptance/rejection to/in/by peer review journals. in Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
Elsevier., 456, 197-203.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2016.03.032
Ausloos M, Nedić O, Dekanski A. Day of the week effect in paper submission/acceptance/rejection to/in/by peer review journals. in Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. 2016;456:197-203.
doi:10.1016/j.physa.2016.03.032 .
Ausloos, Marcel, Nedić, Olgica, Dekanski, Aleksandar, "Day of the week effect in paper submission/acceptance/rejection to/in/by peer review journals" in Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 456 (2016):197-203,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2016.03.032 . .
184
20
14
17