5S Elements as steps to bridge the gap in transmitter manufacturing process
5S elementi kao koraci za premošćivanje procepa u procesu prozvodnje transmitera
Authors
Vorkapić, MilošBogetić, Srđan
Tanović, Dragoljub
Hasan, Mohammad Sakib
Kovačević, Aleksandar
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
In this paper, GAP analysis and 5S tool are applied in the case of realization of a compact pressure
transmitter. GAP analysis, combined with the 5S tool, can qualitatively indicate the critical points
in the manufacturing, assembly and quality control of a finished transmitter. Existing errors lead to
the appearance of possible risks in the realization of production processes, from the input of raw
materials to the assembly of the finished product. In order to eliminate the existing errors, the main
steps of the GAP analysis are described in detail. Guidelines are provided on how to improve the
workplace manufacturing process through certain improvements by applying all 5S elements.
According to the implemented action plan, the main causes of risk occurrence in the GAP analysis
were: human factor and processing technologies. The human factor was characterized by poor
control in the workplace (there is no discipline), poor training and incompetence of employees for
the given ...tasks. Processing technology involves obsolete machines, which can introduce deviations
of dimensions and tolerances from the prescribed values.
U ovom radu, analizirani su GAP analiza i 5S alat na primeru realizacije malogabaritnog transmitera pritiska. GAP analiza, u kombinaciji sa 5S alatom, može kvalitetno ukazuje na kritične tačke u procesu proizvodnje, sklapanja i kontrole gotovog transmitera. Postojeće greške dovode do pojave mogućih rizika u realizaciji proizvodnih procesa, od ulaza repromaterijala do sklapanja gotovog proizvoda. Analiza rizika, omogućava organizaciji da preuzme određene korake u prihvatanju ili smanjenju njegovog uticaja. 5S alat u GAP analizi pomaže da se rizična mesta srede i dovedu u funkcionalno stanje, sa što manje gubitaka (otpada). Zbog eliminacije postojećih grešaka, u radu su detaljno opisani glavni koraci GAP analize. Date su smernice kako da se unapredi proces proizvodnje na radnom mestu kroz određena poboljšanja primenom svih 5S elemenata. Prema sprovedenom akcionom planu konstatovano je da su glavni uzročnici pojave rizika u GAP analizi sledeći: ljudski faktor i tehnologije obrade. Ljudski... faktor je okarakterisan slabom kontrolom na radnom mestu (ne postoji disciplina), slabom obukom i nekompetentnošću zaposlenih za propisano radno mesto. Tehnologija obrade podrazumeva tehnološki zastarele mašine i odstupanja mera i tolerancija od propisanih vrednosti
Keywords:
GAP Analysis / 5S / Risk / Manufacturing process / Transmitter / Improvement / GAP analyza / 5S / Rizik / Proces proizvodnje / Transmiter / UnapređenjeSource:
Journal of Engineering Management and Competitiveness (JEM), 2019, 9, 2, 148-158Publisher:
- Zrenjanin: University of Novi Sad - 'Mihajlo Pupin' Technical Faculty
Funding / projects:
- Micro- Nanosystems and Sensors for Electric Power and Process Industry and Environmental Protection (RS-32008)
- Research and Development of Advanced Design Approaches for High Performance Composite Rotor Blades (RS-35035)
Collections
Institution/Community
IHTMTY - JOUR AU - Vorkapić, Miloš AU - Bogetić, Srđan AU - Tanović, Dragoljub AU - Hasan, Mohammad Sakib AU - Kovačević, Aleksandar PY - 2019 UR - https://cer.ihtm.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3470 AB - In this paper, GAP analysis and 5S tool are applied in the case of realization of a compact pressure transmitter. GAP analysis, combined with the 5S tool, can qualitatively indicate the critical points in the manufacturing, assembly and quality control of a finished transmitter. Existing errors lead to the appearance of possible risks in the realization of production processes, from the input of raw materials to the assembly of the finished product. In order to eliminate the existing errors, the main steps of the GAP analysis are described in detail. Guidelines are provided on how to improve the workplace manufacturing process through certain improvements by applying all 5S elements. According to the implemented action plan, the main causes of risk occurrence in the GAP analysis were: human factor and processing technologies. The human factor was characterized by poor control in the workplace (there is no discipline), poor training and incompetence of employees for the given tasks. Processing technology involves obsolete machines, which can introduce deviations of dimensions and tolerances from the prescribed values. AB - U ovom radu, analizirani su GAP analiza i 5S alat na primeru realizacije malogabaritnog transmitera pritiska. GAP analiza, u kombinaciji sa 5S alatom, može kvalitetno ukazuje na kritične tačke u procesu proizvodnje, sklapanja i kontrole gotovog transmitera. Postojeće greške dovode do pojave mogućih rizika u realizaciji proizvodnih procesa, od ulaza repromaterijala do sklapanja gotovog proizvoda. Analiza rizika, omogućava organizaciji da preuzme određene korake u prihvatanju ili smanjenju njegovog uticaja. 5S alat u GAP analizi pomaže da se rizična mesta srede i dovedu u funkcionalno stanje, sa što manje gubitaka (otpada). Zbog eliminacije postojećih grešaka, u radu su detaljno opisani glavni koraci GAP analize. Date su smernice kako da se unapredi proces proizvodnje na radnom mestu kroz određena poboljšanja primenom svih 5S elemenata. Prema sprovedenom akcionom planu konstatovano je da su glavni uzročnici pojave rizika u GAP analizi sledeći: ljudski faktor i tehnologije obrade. Ljudski faktor je okarakterisan slabom kontrolom na radnom mestu (ne postoji disciplina), slabom obukom i nekompetentnošću zaposlenih za propisano radno mesto. Tehnologija obrade podrazumeva tehnološki zastarele mašine i odstupanja mera i tolerancija od propisanih vrednosti PB - Zrenjanin: University of Novi Sad - 'Mihajlo Pupin' Technical Faculty T2 - Journal of Engineering Management and Competitiveness (JEM) T1 - 5S Elements as steps to bridge the gap in transmitter manufacturing process T1 - 5S elementi kao koraci za premošćivanje procepa u procesu prozvodnje transmitera VL - 9 IS - 2 SP - 148 EP - 158 DO - 10.5937/jemc1902148V ER -
@article{ author = "Vorkapić, Miloš and Bogetić, Srđan and Tanović, Dragoljub and Hasan, Mohammad Sakib and Kovačević, Aleksandar", year = "2019", abstract = "In this paper, GAP analysis and 5S tool are applied in the case of realization of a compact pressure transmitter. GAP analysis, combined with the 5S tool, can qualitatively indicate the critical points in the manufacturing, assembly and quality control of a finished transmitter. Existing errors lead to the appearance of possible risks in the realization of production processes, from the input of raw materials to the assembly of the finished product. In order to eliminate the existing errors, the main steps of the GAP analysis are described in detail. Guidelines are provided on how to improve the workplace manufacturing process through certain improvements by applying all 5S elements. According to the implemented action plan, the main causes of risk occurrence in the GAP analysis were: human factor and processing technologies. The human factor was characterized by poor control in the workplace (there is no discipline), poor training and incompetence of employees for the given tasks. Processing technology involves obsolete machines, which can introduce deviations of dimensions and tolerances from the prescribed values., U ovom radu, analizirani su GAP analiza i 5S alat na primeru realizacije malogabaritnog transmitera pritiska. GAP analiza, u kombinaciji sa 5S alatom, može kvalitetno ukazuje na kritične tačke u procesu proizvodnje, sklapanja i kontrole gotovog transmitera. Postojeće greške dovode do pojave mogućih rizika u realizaciji proizvodnih procesa, od ulaza repromaterijala do sklapanja gotovog proizvoda. Analiza rizika, omogućava organizaciji da preuzme određene korake u prihvatanju ili smanjenju njegovog uticaja. 5S alat u GAP analizi pomaže da se rizična mesta srede i dovedu u funkcionalno stanje, sa što manje gubitaka (otpada). Zbog eliminacije postojećih grešaka, u radu su detaljno opisani glavni koraci GAP analize. Date su smernice kako da se unapredi proces proizvodnje na radnom mestu kroz određena poboljšanja primenom svih 5S elemenata. Prema sprovedenom akcionom planu konstatovano je da su glavni uzročnici pojave rizika u GAP analizi sledeći: ljudski faktor i tehnologije obrade. Ljudski faktor je okarakterisan slabom kontrolom na radnom mestu (ne postoji disciplina), slabom obukom i nekompetentnošću zaposlenih za propisano radno mesto. Tehnologija obrade podrazumeva tehnološki zastarele mašine i odstupanja mera i tolerancija od propisanih vrednosti", publisher = "Zrenjanin: University of Novi Sad - 'Mihajlo Pupin' Technical Faculty", journal = "Journal of Engineering Management and Competitiveness (JEM)", title = "5S Elements as steps to bridge the gap in transmitter manufacturing process, 5S elementi kao koraci za premošćivanje procepa u procesu prozvodnje transmitera", volume = "9", number = "2", pages = "148-158", doi = "10.5937/jemc1902148V" }
Vorkapić, M., Bogetić, S., Tanović, D., Hasan, M. S.,& Kovačević, A.. (2019). 5S Elements as steps to bridge the gap in transmitter manufacturing process. in Journal of Engineering Management and Competitiveness (JEM) Zrenjanin: University of Novi Sad - 'Mihajlo Pupin' Technical Faculty., 9(2), 148-158. https://doi.org/10.5937/jemc1902148V
Vorkapić M, Bogetić S, Tanović D, Hasan MS, Kovačević A. 5S Elements as steps to bridge the gap in transmitter manufacturing process. in Journal of Engineering Management and Competitiveness (JEM). 2019;9(2):148-158. doi:10.5937/jemc1902148V .
Vorkapić, Miloš, Bogetić, Srđan, Tanović, Dragoljub, Hasan, Mohammad Sakib, Kovačević, Aleksandar, "5S Elements as steps to bridge the gap in transmitter manufacturing process" in Journal of Engineering Management and Competitiveness (JEM), 9, no. 2 (2019):148-158, https://doi.org/10.5937/jemc1902148V . .