Приказ основних података о документу

dc.creatorDekanski, Aleksandar
dc.creatorDrvenica, Ivana
dc.creatorNedić, Olgica
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-30T17:52:27Z
dc.date.available2019-01-30T17:52:27Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn1451-9372
dc.identifier.urihttps://cer.ihtm.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2051
dc.description.abstractA survey was conducted among editors of journals publishing in the field of chemistry, chemical technology and related topics in Serbia, aiming to collect information on their experience, problems and difficulties during peer-review process. Editors from 22 journals out of 27 that regularly published during 2015 replied. General data on journals were collected from responses obtained from editors-in-chief, whereas all editors (including sub-editors and section editors) participated in a questionnaire concerning peer-review procedure. Additionally, they were asked to evaluate quality of reports and attitude of reviewers, discuss present situation and suggest measures to improve peer-review process. The greatest problems encountered by editors in peer-review process can be summarized as follows: low rate of acceptance to review, low quality of reports, sometimes due to the reviewer's bias or their inability to properly understand the review process. A method used to search for reviewers does not substantially influence the quality of reports. Editors agree that introduction of On-Line processes and creation of precise instructions for reviewers, education of potential reviewers, as well as social, public and professional recognition and appreciation of reviewers' work, are the most important measures to improve the quality of the peer-review process and, consecutively, the quality of published articles and journals.en
dc.publisherAssociation of the Chemical Engineers of Serbia
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceChemical Industry and Chemical Engineering Quarterly / CICEQ
dc.subjectscientific publishingen
dc.subjectsearch for reviewersen
dc.subjectquality of peer-review reportsen
dc.subjecton-line processing of papersen
dc.titlePeer-review process in journals dealing with chemistry and related subjects published in Serbiaen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseBY-NC-ND
dcterms.abstractНедиц, Олгица; Дрвеница, Ивана; Декански, Aлександар;
dc.citation.volume22
dc.citation.issue4
dc.citation.spage491
dc.citation.epage501
dc.citation.other22(4): 491-501
dc.citation.rankM23
dc.identifier.doi10.2298/CICEQ160328033D
dc.identifier.fulltexthttps://cer.ihtm.bg.ac.rs//bitstream/id/8479/2049.pdf
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85009212491
dc.identifier.wos000392923800013
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу