Peer-review process in journals dealing with chemistry and related subjects published in Serbia
Апстракт
A survey was conducted among editors of journals publishing in the field of chemistry, chemical technology and related topics in Serbia, aiming to collect information on their experience, problems and difficulties during peer-review process. Editors from 22 journals out of 27 that regularly published during 2015 replied. General data on journals were collected from responses obtained from editors-in-chief, whereas all editors (including sub-editors and section editors) participated in a questionnaire concerning peer-review procedure. Additionally, they were asked to evaluate quality of reports and attitude of reviewers, discuss present situation and suggest measures to improve peer-review process. The greatest problems encountered by editors in peer-review process can be summarized as follows: low rate of acceptance to review, low quality of reports, sometimes due to the reviewer's bias or their inability to properly understand the review process. A method used to search for reviewers ...does not substantially influence the quality of reports. Editors agree that introduction of On-Line processes and creation of precise instructions for reviewers, education of potential reviewers, as well as social, public and professional recognition and appreciation of reviewers' work, are the most important measures to improve the quality of the peer-review process and, consecutively, the quality of published articles and journals.
Кључне речи:
scientific publishing / search for reviewers / quality of peer-review reports / on-line processing of papersИзвор:
Chemical Industry and Chemical Engineering Quarterly / CICEQ, 2016, 22, 4, 491-501Издавач:
- Association of the Chemical Engineers of Serbia
DOI: 10.2298/CICEQ160328033D
ISSN: 1451-9372
WoS: 000392923800013
Scopus: 2-s2.0-85009212491
Институција/група
IHTMTY - JOUR AU - Dekanski, Aleksandar AU - Drvenica, Ivana AU - Nedić, Olgica PY - 2016 UR - https://cer.ihtm.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2051 AB - A survey was conducted among editors of journals publishing in the field of chemistry, chemical technology and related topics in Serbia, aiming to collect information on their experience, problems and difficulties during peer-review process. Editors from 22 journals out of 27 that regularly published during 2015 replied. General data on journals were collected from responses obtained from editors-in-chief, whereas all editors (including sub-editors and section editors) participated in a questionnaire concerning peer-review procedure. Additionally, they were asked to evaluate quality of reports and attitude of reviewers, discuss present situation and suggest measures to improve peer-review process. The greatest problems encountered by editors in peer-review process can be summarized as follows: low rate of acceptance to review, low quality of reports, sometimes due to the reviewer's bias or their inability to properly understand the review process. A method used to search for reviewers does not substantially influence the quality of reports. Editors agree that introduction of On-Line processes and creation of precise instructions for reviewers, education of potential reviewers, as well as social, public and professional recognition and appreciation of reviewers' work, are the most important measures to improve the quality of the peer-review process and, consecutively, the quality of published articles and journals. PB - Association of the Chemical Engineers of Serbia T2 - Chemical Industry and Chemical Engineering Quarterly / CICEQ T1 - Peer-review process in journals dealing with chemistry and related subjects published in Serbia VL - 22 IS - 4 SP - 491 EP - 501 DO - 10.2298/CICEQ160328033D ER -
@article{ author = "Dekanski, Aleksandar and Drvenica, Ivana and Nedić, Olgica", year = "2016", abstract = "A survey was conducted among editors of journals publishing in the field of chemistry, chemical technology and related topics in Serbia, aiming to collect information on their experience, problems and difficulties during peer-review process. Editors from 22 journals out of 27 that regularly published during 2015 replied. General data on journals were collected from responses obtained from editors-in-chief, whereas all editors (including sub-editors and section editors) participated in a questionnaire concerning peer-review procedure. Additionally, they were asked to evaluate quality of reports and attitude of reviewers, discuss present situation and suggest measures to improve peer-review process. The greatest problems encountered by editors in peer-review process can be summarized as follows: low rate of acceptance to review, low quality of reports, sometimes due to the reviewer's bias or their inability to properly understand the review process. A method used to search for reviewers does not substantially influence the quality of reports. Editors agree that introduction of On-Line processes and creation of precise instructions for reviewers, education of potential reviewers, as well as social, public and professional recognition and appreciation of reviewers' work, are the most important measures to improve the quality of the peer-review process and, consecutively, the quality of published articles and journals.", publisher = "Association of the Chemical Engineers of Serbia", journal = "Chemical Industry and Chemical Engineering Quarterly / CICEQ", title = "Peer-review process in journals dealing with chemistry and related subjects published in Serbia", volume = "22", number = "4", pages = "491-501", doi = "10.2298/CICEQ160328033D" }
Dekanski, A., Drvenica, I.,& Nedić, O.. (2016). Peer-review process in journals dealing with chemistry and related subjects published in Serbia. in Chemical Industry and Chemical Engineering Quarterly / CICEQ Association of the Chemical Engineers of Serbia., 22(4), 491-501. https://doi.org/10.2298/CICEQ160328033D
Dekanski A, Drvenica I, Nedić O. Peer-review process in journals dealing with chemistry and related subjects published in Serbia. in Chemical Industry and Chemical Engineering Quarterly / CICEQ. 2016;22(4):491-501. doi:10.2298/CICEQ160328033D .
Dekanski, Aleksandar, Drvenica, Ivana, Nedić, Olgica, "Peer-review process in journals dealing with chemistry and related subjects published in Serbia" in Chemical Industry and Chemical Engineering Quarterly / CICEQ, 22, no. 4 (2016):491-501, https://doi.org/10.2298/CICEQ160328033D . .